[Burichan] [Futaba] [Nice] [Pony]  -  [WT]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]
Posting mode: Reply
Name (optional)
Email (optional, will be displayed)
Subject    (optional, usually best left blank)
Message
File []
Embed (advanced)   Help
Password  (for deleting posts, automatically generated)
  • How to format text
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, MP3, PNG, SWF
  • Maximum file size allowed is 10000 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.

File 139256853103.png - (11.90KB , 312x295 , slowpoke.png )
10430 No. 10430 ID: 5b4b49

Just realized something, reviewing the Hobbit Cartoon.

>Crush, smack! Whip crack!
>Smash, grab! Pinch, nab!
>You go, my lad!
>Ho, ho! my lad!
...
>Goblins quaff, and Goblins beat
>Goblins laugh, and Goblins bleat
>Batter, jabber, whip, and taver hoooooo!

Versus a certain module series.

>Goblins chew and goblins bite
>Goblins cut and goblins fight
>Stab the dog and cut the horse
>Goblins eat and take by force!

Pic related, it's a picture of me.
>>
No. 10431 ID: e607cd

So what you are saying is, certain intellectual properties intimately linked with (but legally distinct from) dungeons and/or dragons may have borrowed inspiration from the literary work of the man responsible for 90% of the modern fantasy genre's groundwork, especially as it relates to dragons and dungeons? Astounding.

I mean this particular connection never became obvious to me either, but I am not surprised that such things happen.
>>
No. 10432 ID: a87e3a

Personally I don't think the two are related at all.
[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]

Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason